LlamaIndex Agents vs Haystack Agents
Quick answer: LlamaIndex Agents leads this head-to-head in 2026, scoring 86 on the Hyland Score against Haystack Agents's 78. It scores higher on the Hyland Score (86 vs 78). Choose Haystack Agents instead if your work fits the "Orchestration" category better.
LlamaIndex Agents
Data agents that reason over your documents.
Try LlamaIndex AgentsSpec-by-spec
LlamaIndex Agents: strengths & weaknesses
- Higher Hyland Score (86 vs 78)
- Freemium pricing lowers the cost of getting started
Haystack Agents: strengths & weaknesses
- Freemium pricing lowers the cost of getting started
- Lower Hyland Score (78 vs 86)
Choose LlamaIndex Agents for most teams
LlamaIndex Agents comes out ahead because it scores higher on the Hyland Score (86 vs 78).
Choose Haystack Agents instead if your work fits the "Orchestration" category better.
LlamaIndex Agents vs Haystack Agents: FAQ
Which is better, LlamaIndex Agents or Haystack Agents?
Based on the Hyland Score, LlamaIndex Agents leads with 86 vs 78, because it scores higher on the Hyland Score (86 vs 78). However, Choose Haystack Agents instead if your work fits the "Orchestration" category better.
Is LlamaIndex Agents free to use?
LlamaIndex Agents uses a Freemium pricing model. It is open source. It can be self-hosted.
Is Haystack Agents free to use?
Haystack Agents uses a Freemium pricing model. It is open source. It can be self-hosted.
Can I use LlamaIndex Agents and Haystack Agents together?
Yes — many teams combine them. LlamaIndex Agents strengths: python, typescript, rag. Haystack Agents strengths: python, pipelines, enterprise. Evaluate both against your actual workload before standardizing on one.